Skip over navigation

Employment law: common conundrums

Related content: Employment law: common conundrums


3.
Claire Fuller
Member - 42 posts
21 Jan 2008 11:27AM

Hi Mike,

Apologies - we had got a calculation wrong!

For nine days of absence over three periods, the calculation should be 3 x 3 x 9 = 81, rather than 3 x 3 x 10 = 90, as was previously written. It was a maths error rather than a formula error, and it has now been rectified in the briefing.

Once again, sorry for the mistake, and the author passes on her sincere thanks for drawing it to our attention!


2.
Kelly Mansfield
Online advisor - 59 posts
21 Jan 2008 11:04AM

Mike - thanks for your query on this. A member of the Network team will call you this morning to discuss further, and we will look into it urgently.

Regards,
Kelly
Head of Network


1.
Mike Cunningham
Member - 1 post
21 Jan 2008 9:28AM

Is it me or are the calculations in this briefing inaccurate?


Add a comment


Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions