Search results for Changing terms and conditions of employment
Subjects
Formats
Services
293 results found showing 1 - 20
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
The recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in Robinson v Tescom Corporation (2007) provides some useful guidance on how employees should and should not act in circumstances where changes are made to their terms and conditions.In this case, Mr Robinson agreed to work (albeit under protest) under new terms of employment imposed by his employer, but later informed his employer that he intended to work under his old terms and conditions. He was subsequently dismissed by his employer for gross insubordination....
Case | 19 Mar 2008
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
...mployment Rights Act 1996. Concurrently, the contract is not binding even the employer insists on having it signed by the employee. The act of signing only indicates that the employee is acknowledging the receipt of the written contract, and does not indicate an acceptance of an offer. So why changing of terms and conditions were ever considered as a binding form of agreement in this case?
Comment | 20 Mar 2008
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
John, I think the gentleman did actually work under protest and then told his employer he would not continue to do so and wanted his old terms back. This seems to be why the ET found against him. If he had continued to work under protest and followed the statutory grievance procedure I believe the employer would have had an opportunity to attempt to resolve the situation. Because he then decided to refuse to work the new conditions his...
Comment | 20 Mar 2008
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
Interesting one . Would it work the other way if an employee agreed to a change in contract and the employer tried to change it back? For example......contract says ABC but employee negotiates different terms and works under those terms then the employer tries to use the original contract . Would the employer then be seen to accept the new conditions if he pays and allows the worker to continue in his employ under the re negotiated terms?
Comment | 20 Mar 2008
-
Contract variation: how to change terms and conditions
Contracts of employment are made up of a variety of terms and conditions which set out the respective obligations between the employer and employee, for example what the employee is employed to do and what he or she will be paid for doing it. The following are examples of the types of contractual terms that may apply: Express terms, which have...
Briefing | 27 Mar 2008
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
Im no expert Dorian but I think you would need to have some sort of collective agreement with for example the union. If its a small workforce you could do it individually. I find clear communication and a fair assessmant of how the change will affct each employee usually sets you on the right path. If anyone strongly objects to the change, listen to them as they may have valid reasons for resisting. Offer some sort of incentive, for example, a period in which the employees may rearrange thwir fi...
Comment | 20 Mar 2008
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
Suppose that the change of conditions merely covered the payment date of net salaries from say the 23rd of the month to the last Friday of the respective month ? How can a management team manage to enact such a change ?
Comment | 20 Mar 2008
-
Changing terms and conditions of employment
Can someone tell me what the expected outcome (consequences) would have been had Mr Robinson continued to work under protest or actually refused to work under the new terms?
Comment | 20 Mar 2008
-
Employees’ terms and conditions: All change?
Most employers are faced with changing employees’ terms and conditions at some point during the employment relationship from making small changes following amendments to policies to large changes after a reorganisation. In what circumstances an employer can do so unilaterally and what issues must be taken into consideration will depen...
News | 9 Jul 2007
-
TUPE: Changing terms and conditions is not automatically constructive dismissal
... Council of Law Reporting, the Court of Appeal decided the appeal in Rossiter -v- Pendragon (and the associated case, Clarke -v- Air Foyle Ltd) last week. The transcript is not yet available. The Court of Appeal has overturned the EAT decisions in both cases, and held that a change to employees' terms and conditions following a TUPE transfer does not automatically amount to a constructive dismissal - the employee still needs to establish a fundamental breach of his pre-transfer rights. Thus a transferee can vary terms in the same way the original employer might have been able to do, if such a v...
Case | 18 May 2002
-
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
...nsfer? Has there been a change in employer? The law in this area is notoriously uncertain, but there will ordinarily be a business transfer if there is a transfer of significant assets from the old employer to the new employer, or where a substantial proportion of the workforce transfers in terms of skill and number. TUPE also applies on a service provision change. A service provision change covers situations where a contract to provide a client (public or private sector) with a business service, e.g. office cleaning, workplace catering, etc., is: awarded to a contractor (‘contrac...
Regulation | 17 Sep 2006
-
TUPE: Changing Employees' Terms and Conditions
... storage undertaking for the RAF by the MoD to an independent contractor (SERCO), and then later a contracting back in of a SERCO contract, including newly engaged employees, back to the MoD. In each case the employees were dismissed prior to the transfer, and then engaged on new detrimental terms and conditions. The EAT analysed the transactions in detail and stated that there was no difference on the facts between these cases and that of Wilson & Others -v- St Helens Borough Council. The Court decided that the dismissals had taken place prior to the transfer in each case and as such t...
Case | 30 Mar 2001
-
Legal issues of employee right to request shares
...o need to be given as to the often vexed definition of good and bad leavers. “Other legal implications are unclear at this stage. It is not clear whether employers will be permitted to require their employees to accept a lower salary in return for getting shares, thus requiring a change to the terms and conditions of employment contracts. “Smaller employers may also fear a dilution of share ownership and the resultant lack of control over key business decisions. Historically, certain schemes attract considerable tax advantages if they are approved by HMRC but again it is not clear wheth...
News | 18 Jan 2012
-
TUPE and outsourcing - update
... ensuring that the outgoing employer is placed under an obligation to notify the incoming employer of the identities of the transferring employees and the associated rights and liabilities that will transfer; clarification of when and how employers may lawfully dismiss employees or change terms and conditions of employment in connection with a transfer, and so reduce the problems caused by current case law in these areas; and imposing joint and several liability on the outgoing and incoming employer for any failure to inform and consult with affected employees with significant fin...
News | 20 Dec 2005
-
Change of Employment Hours
Yes implied terms and conditions are legal, if they have been in force over twelve months, and you have to issue a HR1 if you cannot negociate amicable terms. If the unions are involved you must carry out consultation, and ensure that it is balloted on. In addition to all this you must ensure that is is supported ...
Comment | 5 May 2011
-
Court of Appeal widens rights to equal pay compensation
...said that it could only be made in relation to the most recent, changed contract. Slack argued that the new contract was a variation of her original contract and did not terminate the original. The Council disagreed, as did the Court of Appeal. "Each claimant signed a document containing detailed terms and conditions of employment," said the Court's ruling. "The document included terms which differed from the previous contracts. Each document expressly stated it superseded any previous contract of employment. The provision was flagged up to the recipients. The documents which each claimant has si...
Case | 16 Apr 2009
-
Headache? Try new and improved law and regulation!
...brought into force to encourage people to talk through disputes and cut the burgeoning number of Employment Tribunal claims being brought against employers. The result? A 55% increase in claims in two years, and a scheme described by one judge as "rebarbative". Now, the dispute resolution regime is changing again. So will it work this time? Claire Fuller investigates, with additional reporting by Hamish Cameron Blackie, Barlow Robbins LLP. Gibbons' subsequent review found that the three-step grievance procedure a written statement from the employee, a hearing held between the employee and employer...
Magazine issue | 1 Apr 2009
-
Private employer may be bound by public sector collective agreements after a TUPE transfer
...ransferred under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (TUPE) to a private contractor. In May 2004 their employment was transferred, again under TUPE, to Parkwood Leisure Limited (PLL). The employees' contracts contained a clause which stated that: “… your terms and conditions of employment will be in accordance with collective agreements negotiated from time to time by the National Joint Council for Local Government Services (NJC)….” After the first transfer the employees were awarded pay increases in line with the NJC pay settlements from 2002 un...
Case | 4 Mar 2009
-
48: How the 48-hour working week could push employers to the max
...e and more ... Establishing health and safety liability in R v. Chargot Limited. Page 28 NEBOSH National General Certificate: choose your direction STUDY OVER 10 WEEKS Contents In this issue ... LATEST 05 EDITORIAL The worlds of health and safety, employment and premises management are forever changing, but it is not often we have a day where breaking news is quite as significant as on 17 December, when the European Parliament voted on proposed amendments to the Working Time Directive. CLASSROOM IN LONDON 22 FOCuS 12 48: puShING WORKING TImE TO ThE mAx? The European Parliament recently voted 4...
Magazine issue | 5 Feb 2009
-
Changes to rights of employees on maternity leave: details
...e rights and obligations of employees during Additional Maternity Leave “AML” and Additional Adoption Leave “AAL” are to be brought in line with the rights and obligations existing during Ordinary Maternity Leave “OML” and Ordinary Adoption Leave “OAL”. This essentially means that terms and conditions enjoyed during OML or OAL will continue during AML and AAL. Currently an Employee on OML or OAL has a statutory right to benefit from their terms and conditions of Employment had they been at work, save for remuneration. In practice this means that if an Employer removes benefits su...
News | 10 Sep 2008
