Woman "forced to retire" cannot put Tribunal on hold to wait for test case verdict

A woman claiming unlawful age discrimination because she was forced to retire at 65 has been denied the right to have her case kept on file until the outcome of another legal challenge.

Mrs A Johns challenged the fact that she had been retired upon reaching the age of 65 by her employer, SD Solent Limited, although she did accept that her employer had followed the correct procedures and that the reason for her dismissal was retirement, which is a fair reason for dismissal.

Johns request... (267 more words)

Member login

If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below

My email address
My password
Keep me logged in:
	I've forgotten my password

Protecting your data

We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.