You need to be a Premium member of the Workplace Law
Network to to access this information or service.
19 Oct 2006 12:00AM
1 Temple Gardens
- Author:
- Daniel Barnett
The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has handed down another decision dealing with the controversial interpretation of s98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
This provision, often referred to as the partial reversal of Polkey, states that "a failure by an employer to follow a procedure in relation to the dismissal of an employee shall not be regarded...as by itself making [the dismissal unfair] if he shows that he would have decided to dismiss the employee if he had followed the p... (176 more words)
If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below
| My email address | |
|---|---|
| My password | |
| Keep me logged in: | |
| I've forgotten my password |

Protecting your data
We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.







