You need to be a Premium member of the Workplace Law
Network to to access this information or service.
7 Mar 2006 12:00AM

- Author:
- CMS Cameron McKenna
Given the uncertainty about the scope of legal advice privilege in an in-house context forecasted by many commentators in the wake of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Three Rivers DC v Governor and Company of the Bank of England the recent decision of University of Southampton v Kelly provides a welcome example of lower court Judges experiencing no such difficulty, applying well-established legal principles to uphold a claim of legal advice privilege in respect of advice provided by an... (705 more words)
If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below
| My email address | |
|---|---|
| My password | |
| Keep me logged in: | |
| I've forgotten my password |

Protecting your data
We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.







