Compromise agreements - identifying precise claims

• Author:
• Philip Bartlett

Summary

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) holds that an ex-employee who had signed a compromise agreement could not bring a claim relating to protected disclosures even though the compromise agreement itself did not specifically state that claims under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) were compromised. The grievances in relation to the protected disclosures have been raised with the employer prior to the signing of the compromise agreement. It was not necessary for them... (1206 more words)

Member login

If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below

My email address
My password
Keep me logged in:
	I've forgotten my password

Protecting your data

We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.