You need to be a Premium member of the Workplace Law
Network to to access this information or service.
19 Mar 2004 8:44AM
Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP
- Author:
- Geraldine Elliott
The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has found that written statements provided by witnesses anonymously due to fear of reprisals can be relied upon in reaching a decision to dismiss an employee for gross misconduct.
Further, it was not necessary for the informants to have been interviewed personally by the decision maker. If the informants were unwilling to sign statements or be questioned further due to genuine fear of retribution from colleagues, it was sufficient for the gist of their ... (10 more words)
If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below
| My email address | |
|---|---|
| My password | |
| Keep me logged in: | |
| I've forgotten my password |

Protecting your data
We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.







