You need to be a Premium member of the Workplace Law
Network to to access this information or service.
27 Aug 2002 12:20PM

- Author:
- Daniel Barnett
Members may recall Rutherford -v- Harvest Town Circle [reported on the Network 1 August 2001], in which the Employment Appeal Tribunal set out the legal test for whether the unfair dismissal / redundancy upper qualifying ages were contrary to EU Art 141.
Last week, the Stratford employment tribunal sent out its reserved decision dealing with the statistics on whether the upper qualifying ages had a disparate impact on women in the workplace and, if so, whether the government could justify th... (322 more words)
If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below
| My email address | |
|---|---|
| My password | |
| Keep me logged in: | |
| I've forgotten my password |

Protecting your data
We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.







