You need to be a Premium member of the Workplace Law
Network to to access this information or service.
2 Jul 2002 3:41PM

- Author:
- Daniel Barnett
The EAT’s recent decision in Esso Petroleum -v- Jarvis (18th January 2002) confirms the catch-22 situation experienced by agency workers who attempt to rely on employment rights which are available to employees only (but not the wider category of ‘workers’).
In that case, the EAT overturned a finding that agency workers were employees of Esso (and thus entitled to claim unfair dismissal). Because there was no contract between the workers and Esso – and thus, by extension, no co... (751 more words)
If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below
| My email address | |
|---|---|
| My password | |
| Keep me logged in: | |
| I've forgotten my password |

Protecting your data
We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.







