EAT: substitution clause aimed to avoid holiday pay

A housing company has lost their appeal at an Employment Appeals Tribunal after the court upheld a previous ruling which stated that the contracts of two bricklayers were “a sham”.

The original case took place nine months ago, and centred on the use of substitution clauses in contracts.

Redrow Homes (Yorkshire Ltd) required the two workers to sign contracts under the role of ‘self-employed bricklayers’. A clause within the contract acted to allow these workers to sen... (163 more words)

Member login

If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below

My email address
My password
Keep me logged in:
	I've forgotten my password

Protecting your data

We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.