Age discrimination was lawful at time of incident, rules EAT

• Author:
• Incorporated Council of Law Reporting

When the claimant employee retired at the age of 60, in April 2001, he was immediately re-engaged by the respondent employers under a fixed-term contract for five years.

In June 2006, after that term had expired, he made a complaint to the Employment Tribunal that he had received less favourable treatment as a fixed-term employee, as the employers had failed to make contributions to his pension after he reached 60.

In October 2006 the claimant applied to the Tribunal for permission to add... (372 more words)

Member login

If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below

My email address
My password
Keep me logged in:
	I've forgotten my password

Protecting your data

We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.