You need to be a Premium member of the Workplace Law
Network to to access this information or service.
29 May 2008 10:41AM

The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Oyarce v. Cheshire CC (2008) that the reverse burden of proof applies in cases of direct and indirect race discrimination and racial harassment only and does not apply to claims of victimisation under the Race Relations Act.
Background
In claims of race discrimination and racial harassment, once the claimant has proved certain elements of their case, the burden shifts to the respondent to provide a non-discriminatory explanation for what has occurred. ... (176 more words)
If you are a member of the Workplace Law
Network, please enter your details below
| My email address | |
|---|---|
| My password | |
| Keep me logged in: | |
| I've forgotten my password |

Protecting your data
We take data protection very seriously. We will never share your data with third parties. We process data in accordance with: the Data Protection Act 1998; the 11th edition of the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Marketing Practice; and the DMA Direct Marketing Code of Practice.







