Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management

Workplace Law Network wins prestigious PPA Award

  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Info centre
  • White papers

Machine Guarding: keeping your workers safe

31 Oct 2007 9:49AM
Procter Machine Guarding
  • Author:
  • Procter Machine Guarding

Related Topics:

  • Health and safety
  • Work equipment

Related Tags:

  •  None
  • add your own tags
  • Add to scrapbook
  • Share this
  • Print friendly version

Employers have a duty under Section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health safety and welfare of all their employees whilst they are at work. An important element of this is the provision and maintenance of safe plant and equipment, which covers machine guards.

In addition to this "enabling" legislation, the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 (as amended) require that machinery must be CE marked to indicate compliance with the Machinery Directive 98/37/EC, and the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER 98) require organisations to provide work equipment that is suitable for its intended task and that can be used without putting persons at risk.

Despite this legislative background, the HSE (Health and Safety Executive) reports that in 2006/07 there were 35 fatalities in the manufacturing industries, which is 1.1 fatalities per 100,000 workers. While it might be hoped that such figures would be falling, in fact the rate of fatal injuries to workers in this sector has fluctuated in recent years, with no statistically significant trend either downwards or - thankfully - upwards.

However, the number of reportable non-fatal injuries should also be considered, and the HSE estimates that in the three-year period from 2003/04 to 2005/06 (the latest year for which these statistics are available) there were 1500 such injuries per 100,000 workers.

And provisional figures for 2005/06 indicate that 24,332 workers in the manufacturing industries suffered injuries that resulted in an absence from work of three days or more. Not all of the above fatalities and injuries relate to contact with moving machinery, but the figures for 2005/06 indicate that contact with moving machinery accounts for around one-quarter of fatalities, 15% of non-fatal major injuries and 9% of over-three-day injuries.

Assuming that properly installed and maintained guards would all but eliminate those fatalities and injuries - and leaving aside for one moment the legal requirements - there is a strong moral case for machine guarding. But there is also a third reason why machine guards should be used, and that relates to the financial costs associated with industrial accidents.

This white paper looks at the legislation, financial considerations, guarding standards and guarding issues. To find out all you need to know about machine guarding, download this white paper now »



Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

YesNo

Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions



  • View all comments (0)

DOWNLOAD NOW

Sorry, to download this document you need to:

  • Become a premium member

COMMENTS (0)
    • View all comments (0)
    • Add your comment
    ON THE NETWORK

    FIND SIMILAR

    See also
    Unguarded machine leads to disqualification of director
    30 Jan 1999: news
    HSE Warning over Machine Guarding Maintenance
    25 Jul 2003: news
    Paper company didn't remedy poor machine-guarding standards
    6 Oct 2006: case
    Insufficient guarding and risk assessment caused amputation
    23 Mar 2007: case
    The importance of guarding dangerous machinery
    9 May 2007: case

    EXTERNAL LINKS

    AVAILABLE FROM WORKPLACE LAW

    Driving at Work 2008: Special Report (hard-copy format)

    Driving at Work 2008: Special Report (electronic format)

    Facilities Management Legal Update Conference 0508

    Health and Safety Strategies 2007: Case Report

    Workplace Law Network Membership - Individual - 12 months

    Upload your image
    View my:
    • Profile
    • Downloads
    • Scrapbook
    • Order history

    My messages0 (0)Shop


    • Premium membership trial

      7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

    • 1 minute tour

      See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

    • Membership quotamator

      Build your own membership quote online!

    • Recommend membership
    • Print friendly version

    AWARDS

    • ppa logo
    • aop logo
    • Absence
    • Accidents at work
    • Alcohol/drugs
    • Asbestos
    • Building regulations
    • Bullying/harassment
    • Business continuity
    • Business regulation
    • Buying and selling property
    • Catering
    • CCTV & employee monitoring
    • Confined spaces
    • Construction
    • Consultation
    • Contract workers
    • Contracts, employment
    • Contracts, facilities management
    • Corporate killing
    • Data protection
    • Director's responsibilities
    • Disability
    • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
    • Discrimination
    • Display screen equipment
    • Driving at work
    • Electrical safety
    • Energy management
    • Environment management
    • Fire safety
    • First aid
    • Fleet management
    • Flexible working
    • Fuel storage
    • Gas safety
    • Hazardous substances
    • Health and safety
    • Health, surveillance
    • Height, working at
    • Holidays
    • Homeworking
    • Human resources
    • Human rights
    • Insurance
    • Intellectual property
    • Internet and email
    • Landlord and tenant
    • Legionella
    • Lighting
    • Lone working
    • Manual handling
    • Maternity, paternity, adoption
    • Minimum wage
    • Money laundering
    • Mothers, new and expectant
    • Nebosh Certificate
    • Noise
    • Outsourcing
    • Parking
    • Pensions and benefits
    • Permits to work
    • Personal protective equipment
    • Pest control
    • Planning procedures
    • Pollution
    • Property management
    • Radiation
    • Rates and revaluation
    • Recruitment and selection
    • Redundancy
    • Security
    • Signage
    • Smoking
    • Stress
    • Trade unions
    • TUPE
    • Vehicles
    • Ventilation, temperature
    • Violence
    • Waste management
    • Welfare facilities
    • Whistleblowing
    • Work equipment
    • Working time
    • About us
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
    • Terms and conditions
    • Accessibility
    • Careers
    • Membership
    • Sitemap
    • NEBOSH certificate
    Promotion code: None

    Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

    © Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2008