Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management

Workplace Law Network wins prestigious PPA Award

  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Info centre
  • White papers

Restrictive Covenants: keeping your employees faithful

12 Sep 2007 10:36AM
Steeles Law
  • Authors:
  • Elizabeth Stevens
  • Ian Robotham

Related Topics:

  • Contracts, employment

Related Tags:

  •  None
  • add your own tags
  • Add to scrapbook
  • Share this
  • Print friendly version

Every business has a body of information that it considers to be secret, confidential, sensitive and integral to that business’ success. Information that, if disclosed to another person, particularly a competitor, could cause significant damage to that business.

In order to protect a business’ market position, employers often attempt to restrict the use of such information by requiring employees to enter into contractual restrictions (usually within their contract of employment) that apply both during employment and after the employment ends.

In broad terms, the methods of restricting employees from competing with their employer fall into two categories:

  1. restrictions applying for as long as the employment relationship continues; and
  2. restrictions applying after the relationship ends.

When an employment relationship is nearing its end, an employer may use an alternative to or supplement restrictive covenants by putting an employee on “garden leave” during his notice period. This is examined in more detail below.

To download this white paper, click on the PDF icon at the top right of this page»



Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

YesNo

Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions



  • View all comments (0)

DOWNLOAD NOW

Sorry, to download this document you need to:

  • Become a premium member

COMMENTS (0)
    • View all comments (0)
    • Add your comment
    ON THE NETWORK

    FIND SIMILAR

    See also
    Restrictive covenant can specify names of competitors: Corporate Express Ltd -v- Day
    23 Feb 2005: case
    Refusal to sign unreasonable restrictive covenants
    22 Nov 2005: case
    Restrictive covenants and unfair dismissal
    12 Oct 2006: case
    Restricting employees' activities - how far can you go?
    31 Aug 2007: news

    EXTERNAL LINKS

    AVAILABLE FROM WORKPLACE LAW

    Workplace Law Handbook 2008

    Occupational Health 2008: making the business case - special report

    Guide to Flexible Working 2008

    Equal Opportunities Policy and Management Guide, version 3.0

    TUPE transfers 2007: rights and responsibilities special report

    Upload your image
    View my:
    • Profile
    • Downloads
    • Scrapbook
    • Order history

    My messages0 (0)Shop


    • Premium membership trial

      7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

    • 1 minute tour

      See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

    • Membership quotamator

      Build your own membership quote online!

    • Recommend membership
    • Print friendly version

    AWARDS

    • ppa logo
    • aop logo
    • Absence
    • Accidents at work
    • Alcohol/drugs
    • Asbestos
    • Building regulations
    • Bullying/harassment
    • Business continuity
    • Business regulation
    • Buying and selling property
    • Catering
    • CCTV & employee monitoring
    • Confined spaces
    • Construction
    • Consultation
    • Contract workers
    • Contracts, employment
    • Contracts, facilities management
    • Corporate killing
    • Data protection
    • Director's responsibilities
    • Disability
    • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
    • Discrimination
    • Display screen equipment
    • Driving at work
    • Electrical safety
    • Energy management
    • Environment management
    • Fire safety
    • First aid
    • Fleet management
    • Flexible working
    • Fuel storage
    • Gas safety
    • Hazardous substances
    • Health and safety
    • Health, surveillance
    • Height, working at
    • Holidays
    • Homeworking
    • Human resources
    • Human rights
    • Insurance
    • Intellectual property
    • Internet and email
    • Landlord and tenant
    • Legionella
    • Lighting
    • Lone working
    • Manual handling
    • Maternity, paternity, adoption
    • Minimum wage
    • Money laundering
    • Mothers, new and expectant
    • Nebosh Certificate
    • Noise
    • Outsourcing
    • Parking
    • Pensions and benefits
    • Permits to work
    • Personal protective equipment
    • Pest control
    • Planning procedures
    • Pollution
    • Property management
    • Radiation
    • Rates and revaluation
    • Recruitment and selection
    • Redundancy
    • Security
    • Signage
    • Smoking
    • Stress
    • Trade unions
    • TUPE
    • Vehicles
    • Ventilation, temperature
    • Violence
    • Waste management
    • Welfare facilities
    • Whistleblowing
    • Work equipment
    • Working time
    • About us
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
    • Terms and conditions
    • Accessibility
    • Careers
    • Membership
    • Sitemap
    • NEBOSH certificate
    Promotion code: None

    Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

    © Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2008