Latest posts:
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Like many others in this professional field, I have a mixture of fascination, horror, disbelief, but sometimes admiration for his views expressed etc that are openly displayed in the programme.
However, that said, it is compulsive viewing, just to see what the outcome is in various situations.
Is it therefore fair to say 'Sir Alan' can get away with all the blatant disregard of many of these 'laws & Directives' already in place, especially because he commands a 'High Profile Status' & has power in much of the public sector??!!
I am of the view that in fact it condones many of the practices & procedures that currently abound in many boardrooms & companies around the UK with disregard to much legislation.
Who, therefore, is in a position to deal with violations similar to this?
Whatever my criticisms of the man are, I admire & respect much of his thinking & decisions, but I wouldn't wish to work for him, other than to try & change his view on a few things regarding current rules & legislation which is supposed to be implemented over all. (Don't think I'd last very long!)
Is he above all these the laws then, especially regarding issues raised last time, & this one, and probably any others in the making?/
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
By the continuance of comments & contributions to this forum on this particular discussion, I conclude that it is a wholly positive action. Hopefully all who participate, or even those who read various comments, will be better equipped & made aware how to deal with such problems if they do appear, & I'm sure they will.
I commend those who have been victims, and if later on they are put in a position of power & influence, it is my sincere hope that it will be used wisely, & to help the less fortunate in the workplace or other to be able to deal effectively with this problem.
I do not think it can ever be eradicated, but efforts & actions can be undertaken to reduce the risk, or the long-term effect of bullying, intimidation or whatever guise it takes.
For those persons out there--managers, Directors or others, if you are suffering any form of oppression or bullying, be encouraged to find someone to talk to on the matter, confidentially, even if it's an On-line Advisor!
At the risk of repeating myself , I have found comments from others during this ongoing discussion & debate to have been useful & positive--Thank You.
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Dear Kelly
I respect the view & understand the need to sometimes stop a discussion if felt it is not useful to anyone to continue--however, there is plenty of evidence to suggest this issue will rear it's head again elsewhere, so why not carry on for another week!
As both an F.M professional, and one who has experienced many forms of bullying', especially in my working life, I confirm that it is an experience & suffering that I would not wish anyone to have to deal with, but I have also found encouragement & support, even after reading many of the contributions that have been made on this Forum on this particular topic.
Also, I believe there is much more help & understanding from Fellow Professionals now, but also a recognition of others that are unable to fight back or represent their case as appropriate.
Tackling Bullying should remain a high priority for anyone with a conscience, but also comes with a price tag & possible personal consequence for the individual trying to get justice & solution.
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Having done thousands of major desk layouts for a major bank nearly 20 years, & for reasons of Fire , & general Health & Safety, I was previously advised to ensure minimum of 800mm gap between desks, or if in a 'Fire ' walkway , a minimum of 1000, or 1200mm if possible.
In cases where occupants sit back to back, there should be a minimum of 800mm allowance between the opposing chairs when the persons are not pulled into the desk.
If, for example there is a person sat behind a desk with a wall at the back & side, then the minimum can come down to 600mm, as no-one else needs to come through the space.
Practically, of course, if you have the room to spread out a little then it's obviously good, but you also need to give consideration to any DDA requirements, which then alter things again & probably bring in 900mm minimum gap requirements.
There are many different parameters & criteria which may effect the final layout, but individual business requirements & practices or processes may also dictate dimensional allowances.
Because people are also different in physical size etc, other allowances should be taken into consideration, so sometimes 'common sense' has a role to play.
Another rule of thumb used to be to try & give everyone 100sq. ft., but that did include desk, chair, storage, filing etc.
However, the 800mm minimum between desks, in my experience proved practical & satisfactory for most applications, other than 'Fire Escvape Routes & corridors etc.
Good luck with your drawing layouts.
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Congratulations to all--Well deserved to win this award at last.
Keep up the good work!!!!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Kelly
It is absolutely right at this stage for Wokplace Law Network to point out that this 'Forum' is not specifically for 'personal arguments', but has also illustrated that the issue of 'Bullying in the Workplace' is still very much alive & kicking. & personal views are diverse.
As individuals in whatever workplace or occupation we find ourselves in, I believe we all have to do everything that we can to put things right wherever possible & take action in conjunction with our individual conscience.
Thanks to all--this has been a very interesting topic to follow since first raised!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Let me tell you that 'Bullying', whether at work, or school, or whatever stage you happen to be at, will NEVER be eliminated!
It also covers all classes & creeds--Take a look at history itself!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
On reading all the comments on this, and other topics, I cannot help but think that standard common-sense has gone completely 'out of the window'!
Most of us really know what is, or not acceptable, without the threat of legislation & threats of 'legal action' for discrimination or whatever.
Without referring to the good old days' , I really think it's about time we went back to just being normal, having a laugh & having fun, although I sincerely believe that we all reserve the right to state if somethings or comments are particularly deemed offensive in particular situations'.
Some people should 'grow up', & forget about trying to extract £'s out of the legal system.
I'm sure there are 'real' issues that some could find to put their energy into!!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Any Company or organization has various forms of 'policy' to deal with bullying, & many play 'lip service' in pretending to deal with the problem.
However, in real life, and having worked in both Engineering & Banking Corporates, I can truly report that, in my own experience, and as a former manager, the bullying & other subtle tactics often come down from 'senior levels' & therefore' they' have the power to hit you financially unless you shut up!
It is commonly known as 'encouragement ' to be a 'team player'.
For anyone who has suffered bullying at school, then they'll understand that in the workplace it's no different & you'll find it in every part of society, at school, in the street, & prison or workplace etc.
I doubt if many cases ever reach major publicity or really get resolved.
The trouble is, there's always someone, or bigger company than yours that can exert various pressure to make you do what they want.
On the bigger issue try a world war or two-- & international domination or Politics------see what I mean!!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Everyone should be 'grapeful' for small mercies!!!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
As a Christian, and as a Health & Safety professional I have found all the above comments very informative, humorus and entertaining.
However, it should be remembered that there are levels of responsibility in all aspects of life, as well as the results of going on the wrong side of lawful neglect.
I think this debate has raised some very interesting items I'd never before dared to consider. I'm rather pleased I wasn't held under why the pastor said the Lords Prayer!!!!
Rate this!
David Wooldridge
Member - 13 posts
Excellent news---however I'm sure there are many cases whereby persons affected do not have the confidence or necessary support to progress their claims through the appropriate channels.
0 (0)
