Latest posts:
John Webb
Member - 1 post
A company car driver has received a Notice of Intended Prosection for speeding (61 mph in 50 mph area). However the NIP is dated 25 days after the alleged offence. Our undertanding is that the 14 day loophole applies which allows the driver to reject the NIP. Is this correct? What is the legal reference for this and does the company have any liability?
The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.
Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.
We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.
Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.
7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.
See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.
Build your own membership quote online!
© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2009
0 (0)
