Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
Only a few places left on this year's must attend facilities management conference
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Forums & Groups

Comments by Paul Glover

Latest posts:

Send message

Not rated yet
Rate this!
13 Oct 2008 8:17AM

Paul Glover - Workplace Law Network
Online advisor - 5 posts

I can't see that the C2W scheme would be of benefit to an employee who has just had a baby and is on AML. I doubt that they would use the C2W scheme in the weeks after conceiving, especially if they are on AML.

In order for any salary sacrifice scheme to be allowable, in the terms of what HMR&C permit, the employees contract needs to be amended in advance of the sacrifice commencing. HMR&C provide useful information on this topic, and the circumstances that you describe in their manuals (EIM 42750) here: http://www.hmce.eu/manuals/eimanual/eim42750.htm.

This seems to suggets that as long as the earnings in the year are reduced by the amount of the benefits received in that year then a sacrifice is permissable.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
24 Apr 2006 5:24PM

Paul Glover - Workplace Law Network
Online advisor - 5 posts

There is a certain amount of case law on this subject, but the test is where the clothing is:

"of a special character dictated by the occupation as a matter of physical necessity."

Each scenario needs to be looked at on it's merits, simply placing a logo on a uniform will not exclude the items of clothing from an Inland Revenue taxation perspective.

Detailed guidance can be obtained from your local Inland Revenue office and also here: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM32455.htm



Not rated yet
Rate this!
12 Dec 2005 10:03AM

Paul Glover - Workplace Law Network
Online advisor - 5 posts

Unless you are deemed an exempt employer (generally those with fewer than five employees or those employers that already offer a company pension scheme which meets certain requirements), employers have a legal requirement to offer access to a stakeholde pension scheme within their workplace. Providing access to a stakeholder scheme does not mean that you have to set up and run a pension scheme ? you, as an employer, merely have to provide the access to a scheme. If none of your employees wish to take advantage of the scheme, you still have to have a scheme in place in which to offer them if they decide otherwise, or if new employees are recruited in the future.

The Pensions Service provide a useful guide to all aspects of administering a stakeholder scheme:
http://www.thepensionservice.gov.uk/resourcecentre/pme/home.asp



Not rated yet
Rate this!
2 Jun 2004 8:44AM

Paul Glover - Workplace Law Network
Online advisor - 5 posts

The option to purchase a bicycle through a company is not strictly a tax benefit. It only becomes a tax benefit if the company provides a bicycle to it's employee; provide being the operative word. The employer still owns the bicycle which, at the employers discretion, it can offer to any employee. The employee doesn't own the bike.

With regards to public transport, a scheme does exist which relates to an employer subsidising public transport, a scheme known as a 'Green Travel Plan', and which must be agreed between the employer and the Inland Revenue in advance. Full details are available on in the Inland Revenue booklet 'IR176 Green Travel'.

Strictly speaking, the employer has to reach an agreement with a local bus company and pay the subsidy directly to them, not the employee.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Sep 2003 3:42PM

Paul Glover - Workplace Law Network
Online advisor - 5 posts

Indeed it is, but only under certain circumstances. Generally if you use a room in your house exclusively for business, once the property is sold a capital gain can arise as the private residence relief is lost on the room in question. You need to make sure that the room is used for both business and pleasure. For the sake of £2 a week the potential liability arising hardly makes the contribution worth while.



Disclaimer

The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.

Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.

We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.

Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.



Fully updated for 2009
Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
  • IOSH
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2009