Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
10th Anniversary Facilities Management Legal Update Conference & Gala Dinner
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Forums & Groups

Comments by John Bartlett

Latest posts:

Send message

Not rated yet
Rate this!
30 Sep 2006 9:09AM

John Bartlett
Member - 5 posts

Clive
This issue has been causing concern for a number of industries including telecommunications.

The HSE have done a lot of research on this but of course their answer to the problem is that you must assess the risk. Not very helpful.

I will contact you to discuss and put you in touch with telecommunications industry

John



Not rated yet
Rate this!
11 Aug 2006 10:44AM

John Bartlett
Member - 5 posts

The answer is not that obvious, I wish it was. Several questions need to be asked.

- What is the experience and qualification of the H&S manager offering the advice? I am the first to say that some of my professional colleagues have done health and safety no favours with their interpretation of an issue. Health and safety professionals must in my view link the issues into cost benefit analaysis. Management understand pounds shillings and pence

- What is the issue and why should management say that the advice given is over the top?

If the advice offered is good advice and the company ignores it and it all goes wrong the company will of course have to answer some very difficult questions. An ACOP [Approved Code Of Practice] doesn't need to be followed but if you don't you will need to show that you have compiled with the law in some other way or a court will find you at fault.

Last but not least you could always get a second opinion on the problem however you then potentially have the issue of undermining the safety manager. Having said that if they are worth their salt they will welcome a second opinion

Hope this helps

John



Not rated yet
Rate this!
26 May 2006 1:02PM

John Bartlett
Member - 5 posts

Like most health and safety consultants I try and have have several cards up my selve for dealing with the 'difficult members of staff'. What you are trying to do is win hearts and minds. Perhaps your employees view this request as 'health and safety gone mad' Who are the proportion of employees causing the problem?

With the fire issue I always intially state that people will have more issues in the home than at work. How will they get out, how will they raise the alarm, do the children know what to do etc. All these points are normaly very well covered in the workplace but home is where the real issue is.
Second approach could be to show them the Bradford City fire video, that may focus a few minds.
Last approach which for me is really the last resort is to remind them about their duties under the HSAWA74 Sect 7 and 8.If that fails you move into the HR area of written warnings as they are breaking the law! Anyone not sure what Sect 7 & 8 is about just read the H&S Law poster that should be displayed in all workplaces. I consider that I have failed doing this last approach and in 15 years have only come close on a couple of occasions. Hope you don't have to take this route. Trying to manage some of the issues in the workplace is like pushing a pea up Mount Everest with your nose!
Good Luck and hope this helps

John



Not rated yet
Rate this!
23 May 2006 5:38PM

John Bartlett
Member - 5 posts

Claire
The basic principals are still the same in Dublin so the simple answer is Yes, employees in Dublin should be doing the course.

Hope this helps

John



Not rated yet
Rate this!
10 May 2006 1:53PM

John Bartlett
Member - 5 posts

Jamie
I confess to not normally answering forums only reading them to consider other peoples viewpoints. Your comments raise some very important points that as a health and safety professional I have questioned and challenged for some time. The key word I feel is 'significant' risk. We then of course move into the person doing the assessments perception of that risk. All very subjective at times. I actually feel that the risk assessment process does not work very well if at all. General speaking the person carrying out the task has never seen the risk assessment that may be required. How many people reading this have actually seen their companies risk assessments I wonder? It?s normally done from a computer by someone. The someone varies from the MD's pa to a qualified and dare I say it a competent health and safety professional. Yes I would agree that generic assessments are not suitable with some tasks however is it fair for me to state that the 'risks' are well known in all industries? For me the issue must be the safe systems of work that have been developed to manage the 'risk'. You refer to this aspect but where we differ slightly is that I do not feel that we are in this instance talking about 'significant risk'and therefore does not warrant writing a risk assessment. I would consider the most important aspect of this is to consider if you start with 5 screwdrivers how do you ensure you end up with 5 at the end of the working day. Very important if you are working on aircraft as you would'nt want to have one stuck in the flying controls! As I get older and become more of a grumpy old man I despair at re inventing the wheel. Well that?s my perception of it and I'm sure some would not agree, however, even the HSE are now running a campaign regarding sensible risk management and state that there is no such thing as no risk.

Regards
John



Disclaimer

The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.

Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.

We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.

Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.



Breathe commercial interiors
NEBOSH National General Certificate
Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2008