Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
Only a few places left on this year's must attend facilities management conference
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Forums & Groups

Comments by Ray Johnson

Latest posts:

Send message

Not rated yet
Rate this!
10 Mar 2004 8:11PM

Ray Johnson
Member - 1 post

You're asking two questions here really Simon: (1) Does this worker's behaviour constitute 'unsafe practice'?; and (2) If so, does it also warrant action for gross misconduct?

There may also be other factors, eg storage of explosive or inflammable materials nearby enough to present a serious risk if smoking is practiced in the area.

Whilst some people might consider the act of smoking itself to be 'unsafe practice', that view is not supported in law (at least not yet). So on what other grounds does the notion of an unsafe practice arise in this worker's case?

Your decision will also need to take into consideration whether your company's no-smoking policy extends to this car park area, and not just the interior of your buildings.

If there is no properly objective case for considering this person to have carried out 'an unsafe practice', and the company's no-smoking policy does not cover this external area but the insides of its property only, then I suggest you have no case for either complaint, particularly as the worker was smoking on their own time.

Any potential tribunal will - as indicated above - expect you to have considered providing a safe environment for smokers within the company for rest periods, and to have gone through the various stages of a reasonable disciplinary procedure.

All other things being even, a 'gross misconduct' charge in this scenario seems doomed, even - dare I say it - ever so slightly over-the-top. You might also be risking a charge against the company of harrassment, and even - if taken to further extremes - eventually one of constructive dismissal.



Disclaimer

The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.

Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.

We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.

Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.



Fully updated for 2009
Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
  • IOSH
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2009