Rate this!
Nigel DuPree
Member - 60 posts
Yaa, making it a thought police problem could end getting very messy in terms of diversity and whilst many employees already suspect their employer may benefit from a visit to Dr Zucky in his metal helmit they also have to acknowledge that they did employ them in the first place..... .
Still leaves matter of whether or not the employee performed their duties sufficiently well to be described as completed safely and compitently ?
If found so, then that leaves the claim for unfair dismissal to be assessed.
I think that is why it is called an employment tribunal rather than, for example, Relate who tend to, as it says on the tin, offer interpersonal 'relationship' breakdown mediation services.
Whilst sure no one should get the two, public and private life, mixed up perhaps in todays hot-seat workplace it would be a good idea to expand occupational health care a little to include a wider interpretation of pastoral or palliative care in the workplace.
I seam to remember an experiment where a community of rats was put under increasing 'pressure' by adding more and more individuals to what were originally very spacious accommodations until they noticed that the once pro-social individuals became a little agitated and more anti-social.
To the point where disturbed behaviours and aggression was normal just before they started reducing their numbers themselves...............
Perhaps the Alpha rat viewed this as a little 'friendly fire' and the collateral damage to community numbers was only to ensure health and safety of the others.
Ho hum I know "no comparison here" but, occupational health is a question of "peer approval" if comunities or societies are going to ensure internal or external CRM (customer relationship management) doesn't turn into a customer / employee retention problem.
0 (0)
