Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
10th Anniversary Facilities Management Legal Update Conference & Gala Dinner
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Forums & Groups
  • Forums
  • Opinion

How well do you know your safety signs?

This discussion is about the briefing How well do you know your safety signs?


Not rated yet
Rate this!
11 Jul 2008 2:22PM

Craig Webster
Member - 1 post

90% !



Not rated yet
Rate this!
11 Jul 2008 4:47PM

Dave Scuse
Member - 1 post

100%



Not rated yet
Rate this!
15 Jul 2008 4:35PM

David Sharp - Workplace Law Network
Online advisor - 127 posts

90% for me, but only after a couple of second guesses in some places. I really can't believe the sign for "Don't switch off"!!!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
15 Jul 2008 7:05PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 151 posts

90% !!!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
16 Jul 2008 8:07AM

David Price
Member - 84 posts

Only 90% how diapointing is that? However of course it all depends on what environment you work in as some safety signs are not in use in every location.

I think Workplace Law Network should send this short test out on a CD Rom to all its members, This will not only highlight the need for knowing safety signs but will get WLN some advertising at the same time.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
16 Jul 2008 9:32AM

janet burton
Member - 63 posts

90% - but five of those I got right, it was my 2nd attempt, so I would only give myself 65%.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
16 Jul 2008 9:36AM

Jessica Rosenthal
Member - 1 post

95% on the first attempt! I don't even work in safety!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 1:34AM

Phill S
Member - 49 posts

100%!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 9:14AM

Mike Kane
Member - 23 posts

100%, but not without a little bit of pondering on a couple of them !!

Mike Kane
fireuk@msn.com



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 9:29AM

Dave Gill
Member - 17 posts

95% No. 7 got me 'mind the step'.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 10:32AM

Martin Stock
Member - 14 posts

90% and 3 of those were second guesses. Some of those signs are really ambiguous! I agree about the don't turn off sign and the 'mind the step'?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 11:08AM

William Love
Member - 5 posts

95% try harder next time



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 11:36AM

Nick Durham
Member - 2 posts

13 correct on first choice, 7 correct on second choice. Not bad tho most i hadnt seen before (regularly used signs!!??) and i had to use common sense to figure them out. i'm sure that if i saw them in situ they'd be clearer to understand e.g. "low shelves".



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 12:25PM

Les Lane
Member - 49 posts

Scored 95% but needed 2 attempts at at least half. Guess we all need to be more aware of signs that we dont use everyday.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 12:44PM

Andrew Walker
Member - 6 posts

Surely the answer given for #8 is incorrect. It is explosive or explosive material - not 'explosion'

Is the 'don't switch off' sign for real? :-)



Members' rating: 12%
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 12:48PM

Dee Candlin
Member - 1 post

Very interesting test - not sure I would have done so well without the multiple choice options - shows importance of words and pictures together. Thank you!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 1:48PM

Malcolm Broadbent
Member - 1 post

Surprising and somewhat misleading.
Also, some signs, such as the laser, are somewhat specialised?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 1:59PM

gordon bell
Member - 1 post

100% but putting my pedantic "safety" hat on, the sign you say indicates an "explosion" is actually used to warn of an "explosive substance". A sign warning of an explosion wouldn't be much use after the event. Do I win £5 ?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 2:11PM

Marine Shah
Member - 1 post

I don't think you should count as a correct answer the ones I answered correctly only at second try. In case of danger you usually don't have a second chance!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 2:32PM

Phil Lemon
Member - 50 posts

can not see the sighs
P



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 3:13PM

Pauline Ohr
Member - 1 post

100% for me on second attempt (I got 89% first time with some second chances)but some of them are rather obscure and had to be guessed at.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
17 Jul 2008 10:18PM

David Jones
Member - 1 post

Testing and Training:
A really good quiz - well done!
I scored 95% - got one wrong!
It's always good to test on safety knowledge - the award-winning training website at www.CDM2007.org provides for fully tested modular on-line training on the new CDM 2007 Regulations and more.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
18 Jul 2008 1:00AM

david townsend
Member - 1 post

95% Thought I was in deep water at one point!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
18 Jul 2008 11:55AM

Mark Diaper
Member - 2 posts

Although I did pretty well, some I had to try twice and if I had language or learning difficulties I'm sure I would have struggled.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
18 Jul 2008 2:21PM

Graham Bentley MBIFM
Member - 5 posts

Some of the signs seem fairly uncommon, however a good test to take.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
21 Jul 2008 8:42AM

Nick Rampton
Member - 1 post

Scored 85% half I had not seen before, of those 3 did not match my logic one of which I have seen on several occasions at the roadside with the script "danger Ice" which was incorrect according to the quiz. This being the case Who is right?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
21 Jul 2008 9:00AM

Stephen Smith
Member - 12 posts

100%



Not rated yet
Rate this!
21 Jul 2008 9:25AM

Suzanne Davies
Member - 3 posts

Number 3 reminds me of what do you see when you look at an ink blot. All I can see is 2 people playing polo riding strange looking Dyson upright vac cleaners.
Failing that it's a teddy bear with horns on its head & human hands, fingers in ears. And I'm not alone a colleague sees ants playing football!
The signs certainly elucidate the need for accompanying text.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
21 Jul 2008 10:27AM

Peter Knopp
Member - 3 posts

Some of the signs in the test are obscure, but I got 18 correct!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
22 Jul 2008 7:58AM

Sue Smith
Member - 2 posts

90%



Not rated yet
Rate this!
22 Jul 2008 9:09AM

Emma McAuley
Member - 16 posts

Wow, I had never seen many of those signs!



Not rated yet
Rate this!
22 Jul 2008 11:12AM

Mary Wragg
Member - 1 post

I was surprised how many signs I failed to recognise! I would not consider an 80% score enough, which just shows that we all depend on the words that go with the signs.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
22 Jul 2008 11:46PM

Marcella Martin
Member - 1 post

only 80%!!! does anyone agree that all safe pass classes should be thought in just english, since we need the text (english) on our Safety Signs?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
24 Jul 2008 7:27AM

Graham Ferris
Member - 2 posts

Good quiz only got 75% because of the second chances - some were just silly without the accompanying english. And don't switch off! what's that about? the switch was already off......



Not rated yet
Rate this!
24 Jul 2008 8:12AM

Mark Shuttleworth
Member - 57 posts

95% with quite a few second guesses but many are far too ambiguous. I too thought it was explosive materials, if it did actually mean explosion i'm not convinced you'd need the sign, or if you'd have anywhere to hang it!
The noise one Suzanne, definitely looked like two ants fighting over a peanut!
Some signs really should be text only.





Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

YesNo

Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions



Disclaimer

The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.

Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.

We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.

Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.



Breathe commercial interiors
NEBOSH National General Certificate
Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2008