Rate this!
Kuang Lim
Member - 46 posts
I see. To protect the employers' best interest instead.
Rate this!
Nigel DuPree
Member - 171 posts
Rock and a hard place remains the choice for most where the breakdown in communications may not be dismissed as just a little clash of personalities between peers or workers and management but is the manifestation of an underlying loss of good quality communications exacerbated by stress.
Breakdown in communications simply means the omission to "listen" !
Not rocket science in the chain of causation but, the capacity to listen to others is usually the first function to be impaired by stress and/or insidious level of fatigue and over time the omission to listen or feedback-blindness builds tension and relationships become strained to the point where someone ends up off sick and/or "blowing the whistle".............
Unless i am mistaken didn't some King loose a country for want of a nail for a horse shoe etc. etc. etc.
Rate this!
Phill S
Member - 81 posts
This is one of those posts I nod to...
I just don't get why listening is so hard to do, especially for those in higher office.
As nigel said, "Not rocket science"
Another problem that I have witnessed today is the lack consideration for the task to be carried out by someone that is able to do that task.
Rather than get people that are already involved with a particular issue, who may have received training to deal with that issue, 'other' managers take it upon themselves to pull rank and issue memos that, rather than solving a problem, creates more problems.
I don't get it
0 (0)
