Rate this!
janet burton
Member - 102 posts
I trust that Eweida wins her case.
It seems singularly unfair that a Christian cannot show her faith by what she wears while those of other faiths can.
Either uniform policy of no jewelry applies to everyone, or it applies with the exception of all displays of faith; it cannot be no jewelry except for certain faiths and still be either fairor honest.
Rate this!
MARIE-CLAIRE CHAMBERLAIN
Member - 9 posts
surely, this argument is going down the exact same lines as the school and bangle argument. The school had strict uniform rules that were overruled by a court to allow the wearing of a 'religious symbol' and so there can be no possible argument in the same not applying in this case. Should this lady not be given the same treatment, then I would hope that a case of discrimination against the Christian faith be brought up. I cannot imagine that these cases could possibly be treated differently.
0 (0)
