Not rated yet
Rate this!
25 Sep 2008 10:05AMRate this!
Kuang Lim
Member - 43 posts
Does that mean employees can also sue for pay cut?
Not rated yet
Rate this!
26 Sep 2008 9:13AMRate this!
Robert Reddin
Member - 2 posts
More likely, this was a marketing exercise on the part of the law firm.
Not rated yet
Rate this!
26 Sep 2008 11:16AMRate this!
Ian Walford
Member - 24 posts
Sounds like it. The original case says it's discretion in a perverse way, as if the reason for non payment was personal like 'you're not getting a bonus because you like strawberry yoghurt and I don't' rather than 'you're not getting a bonus because the economy is failing, this bank's failing and we're not making any money to pay your bonus'
Not rated yet
Rate this!
29 Sep 2008 1:45PMRate this!
James Fairchild
Member - 336 posts
Wasn't there a case a year or so where a banker tried (and failed) to claim that the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applied to his low bonus?
0 (0)
