Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
Only a few places left on this year's must attend facilities management conference
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Forums & Groups
  • Forums
  • Q & A

Asbestos




Not rated yet
Rate this!
29 Oct 2003 4:53PM

Steve Price
Member - 4 posts

We have recently commissioned a level 2 asbestos risk assessment to a building we maintain. The report included sampling and in relation to the atrex on the ceiling of the main foyer, states "Although 2 of 3 samples came back negative we would still presume that there is trace chrystotile throughout the atrexed ceilings. Remove where badly flaking, mark and manage"

Is this sound advice and would the "removal" be a specialist task?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
30 Oct 2003 9:52AM

Nigel Hale
Member - 13 posts

Steve,

Some older artex typically contains between 2 and 5% chrystotile and although your survey samples have not identified any chrystotile, the surveyor is simply saying that there could be chrystotile in other areas of the covering. Without extensive sampling and analysis the surveyors would be remiss if they said anything else. The old addage is that 'Absence of evidence should not be taken as evidence of absence'.

The surveyors advice amounts to saying that the hazard from the artex is low so long as it is managed and it remains in a condition or location where it is not likely to become airborne or dispersed. In that case it should be made safe or removed. If you do decide to remove any areas of artexing or make any repairs you would be well advised to take further advice from an approved asbestos removal contractor - although there are circumstances where you can do some work yourself. For small areas the cost of geeting a contractor to remove the material is not likely to be great so that the savings associated with doing it yourself are equally not likely to be great.

Our Group of companies includes an asbestos consultancy and removal division who would be happy to provide further guidance if required. Should you wish to discuss this or any other asbestos related matters please contact Mr Chris Webber on 01992 535445.

I hope that this helps.

Nigel Hale

Environmental Management Solutions Group Ltd



Not rated yet
Rate this!
31 Oct 2003 2:20AM

Bill Parker
Member - 55 posts

The advice from Nigel Hale is quite right. The current Regulations permit you to remove asbestos when the complete job (including preparation) will take less than an hour. This is only practicable for small areas.

In fact, there are no known cases of Mesothelioma that have arisen from exposure to Chrysotile (white asbestos) but it is treated under Regulation in the same way as Brown and Blue, which, due to the physical fibre properties, are much more dangerous.

Chrysotile is chemically similar to talcum powder and its fibres are flimsy, such that they tend to break up and disperse, when ground or when mixed with water, for any length of time. Danger from ACM in only evident when fibres are ingested or breathed from the atmosphere. Wetting the artex thoroughly would prevent such case but you still have to dispose of it at a licensed site, should there be a suspicion of ACM.

In the case of "possible" ACM, as Chrysotile in Artex and similar decorating products, it might be best painted and left in situ; if it is good condition.

The HSE publishes a number of guides, on its web site, regarding working with asbestos. These are mostly free and easy to read. We have copies os various guides and a free paper on Asbestos and its hazards. If required, apply to me, Bill Parker at Helios Safety & Rescue, Unit 5, The Old Smithfield, Shifnal, Shropshire TF11 8DT

'phone 01952 461541.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
12 Nov 2003 9:07AM

John Richards - Thames Laboratories
Online advisor - 8 posts

Steve,

I would generally agree with the comments made in the on-line forum regarding artex and other textured coatings. The variability of the mix does creat problems and it is not unusual to find a mixture of result. Textured coatings are for the purposes of the asbestos licensing regulations are defined as coatings and coatings are licensed products requiring the use of licensed asbestos contractor.

The advice that you have been given regarding removal of the flaking material is probably correct, you do not however talk about extent, it maybe possible for you to undertake this work in house following the guidance contained in Asbestos Essentials (available HSE books) but for most organisations the cost of complying with the guidance given in this publication is such that a licensed specialist will be the easiest route to follow.

Best regards,

John Richards
Thames Laboratories



Not rated yet
Rate this!
22 Jul 2005 12:56PM

Anonymous

recently moved to new house. The landlord informed us that there is asbestos in the flooring and advised us that we should not disturb it. Further investigations have shown it to be chrystotile. We would like to know if this is safe as we have been there some time before we were informed. We also have a 9 month old that is crawling around.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
26 Jan 2006 12:55PM

Anonymous

I am presuming that the chrysotile will be in the floor tiles in your property, in which case the risk posed by this type of material is very low. The asbestos fibres are well bound into the matrix of the floor tiles and therefore will only become airborne if the tiles are damaged.

I hope this helps.

Rob Franklin
Asbestos consultancy & Management ltd
07730 416 690



Not rated yet
Rate this!
28 Jan 2006 7:35PM

Paul Chalkley
Member - 1 post

I have been asked to remove and dispose of a small ceiling that contains chrisotyle asbestos, If this takes less than an hour am I operating within guidelines.
Do i need to be registered for anything in order to dispose of this properly, or will I be allowed to take it to a registered disposal site without a requirement for a license when I arrive there.
Any other information would be appreciated.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
1 Nov 2008 8:43AM

Digby Saunders
Member - 5 posts

Hi, We are a charity shop with artex in a ceiling and have been given an improvement order. It will take longer than an hour to remove and we cannot find anyone to do it. Can I seal it in? Is the cost our responsibility or the landlords? The ceiling was damaged by a long term water leak before we took up the lease. Thanks Digby Saunders



Not rated yet
Rate this!
4 Nov 2008 9:31AM

Chris Salter
Member - 2 posts

Digby

My view is that it would depend on the extent of the damage; it may be possible to seal any cracks and paint the ceiling. But you would need advice from an accredited asbestos removal contractor; details should be available from the UKAS website.
It would also depend on how specific the improvement order is; if it expressly requires removal you may have no alternative.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
4 Nov 2008 1:10PM

Digby Saunders
Member - 5 posts

Thanks Chris,
It actually states 'any other equally effective means, to comply with the notice, may be used' . We have also had an accredited contractor who states that it can be concealed with the appropriate notices. Still not sure who is going to pay for it-we are trying the insurance company as it was damaged by a water leak from an upstairs flat. Thanks again, Digby





Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

YesNo

Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions



Disclaimer

The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.

Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.

We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.

Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.



Fully updated for 2009
Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
  • IOSH
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2009