Health & Safety Fines Increase: 1
As previously reported, health and safety fines are set to rise
following the Court of Appeal's statement last year in R -v- Howe
& Sons that the level of fines was too low. Two recent cases show
that the new guidelines set out in that case are already having an
effect on decisions in the Magistrates and Crown Courts.
Dunlop Tyres Limited was fined £100,000 plus £2,855 in
costs after being convicted for the death of an employee last year at
one of its West Midlands sites. The employee was killed after
becoming entangled in heavy machinery, which was inadequately
guarded. Despite pleading guilty to breaching Section 2 of the Health
& Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA), Dunlop was committed to the
Crown Court for sentencing as the Magistrates felt that their powers
were insufficient for this case. The maximum fine available in the
Magistrates Court is £20,000 for Section 2 offences, whereas
fines are unlimited in the Crown Court.
R -v- Dunlop Tyres Limited
Health & Safety Fines Increase: 2
A prosecution following the Rivenhall de-railment in September
1997 has attracted a record fine for a railway accident of
£500,000. The fine was imposed on Balfour Beatty Rail
Maintenance Limited who pleaded guilty to a breach of Section 3 of
HSWA. The accident occurred where Balfour Beatty was rectifying a
slurried track, which had drainage problems. In determining the level
of fine, the Crown Court judge considered the very real danger that
lives would have been lost if a passenger train had crashed into the
de-railed freight train. The cause of the accident was held to be
lack of supervision by Balfour Beatty, and the use of a manifestly
unsafe method of work. The judge indicated that only Balfour Beatty's
early guilty plea and their immediate steps to prevent a repetition
of the incident prevented the fine reaching seven figures.
R -v- Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Limited
This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.