Skip over navigation

Plans to enforce female quotas on boards advancing



    Date:
    8 Jul 2011

    Print friendly version

    The European Union’s plans to enforce gender diversity quotas on boards are advancing, with calls in the European Parliament for EU-wide legislation to be put in place ensuring minimum female representation of at least 40%on supervisory boards by 2020.

     

    Law firm Eversheds says that whilst plans to impose quotas are still some way off,  there is a general acceptance that if member states/companies do not move to a more diverse board structure voluntarily, European legislators will enforce quotas in order to increase the pace of change and ensure greater female representation in listed companies across Europe.

     

    Mark Spinner, partner at Eversheds, commented:

     

    “Gender diversity is generally accepted as a good thing and there are now a number of reports which indicate that there is a positive correlation between greater female representation and company (share price) performance. However, once you look outside of political circles, support levels for the introduction of quotas are low, notably amongst corporates. Research undertaken for the Eversheds Board Report, in which directors were interviewed for their views on the topic, identified only one director who was definitely a supporter of quotas, although the majority were in favour of gender diversity.

     

    “The vast majority of directors are concerned that the introduction of quotas will result in a move away from merit based selection in order to ensure delivery against arbitrary targets. The real issue for companies is ensuring that recruitment criteria which emphasise the importance of achieving the desirable balance of skills and attributes brought by a diverse board are properly set in place. One result of this would be a decreasing importance being placed on ‘previous experience,’ which would likely result in more female candidates coming under consideration.

     

    “Another important issue is a widening of the selection pool from which candidates are chosen. Whilst the central selection pool remains restricted to FTSE100/250 companies, improving gender diversity will remain a challenge as there are already too few women to choose from. Companies need to look outside the conventional hunting grounds, for example, to the public sector/civil service, and/or the education and healthcare sectors where there tend to be a higher proportion of women in senior positions with appropriate and relevant experience and transferrable skills sets.”

     

    A recent survey conducted by Inspire, a female executive board network, found that despite 81% of women feeling that bias in the appointment process has a major impact on female representation, almost two-thirds (64%) do not support legal quotas. 

    Related topics:

    Add a comment


    Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

    Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions


    This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.