Skip over navigation

Ford Motor Company Fined £42K for Losing Radioactive Equipment


    Date:
    28 Mar 2003

    Print friendly version

    Essex-based Ford Motor Company Limited has been fined £42,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3,995 following a prosecution by the Environment Agency Anglian Region under the Radioactive Substances Act 1993.

    The company pleaded guilty to two offences relating to the loss of a radioactive source, a paint spray stat-attack gun containing polonium 210. The company also pleaded guilty to failing to report the loss of the radioactive source to either the Environment Agency or the Police and failing to take adequate steps to recover the radioactive source.

    The Court heard that, on 24 January 2002, the paint sprayers employed by Ford Motor Company Ltd at their Arisdale Avenue site discovered that the stat-attack refinishing gun had gone missing, and an initial search of the paint shop revealed nothing. The following day the paint sprayers reported the loss and a further search made.

    AEA Technology made a routine visit to the premises to replace the radioactive source, but this visit was not instigated by Ford Motor Company Ltd. AEA Technology advised the company that they should inform the Environment Agency regarding the loss of the radioactive source.

    Eventually, on 11 February 2002, the incident was finally reported to the Agency. Following this report, two members of the Agency’s Radioactive Substances Regulation team visited the Aveley plant on 13 November 2002 with the intention of investigating the loss.

    Witness statements collected from the paint-shop staff indicated that there was no control procedure as regards to security of the radioactive source on a day-to-day basis. Having discovered that the source was missing, only a cursory search took place and the company did not have any emergency plan in place to retain or recall waste.

    David Howard, Environment Agency Officer, said of the case, "This incident could have been avoided had appropriate procedures been in place. It is disappointing that the management failed to adhere to current legislation and to understand the effects that their neglect can have on the surrounding environment."

    Related topics:

    Add a comment


    Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

    Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions


    This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.