Skip over navigation

Construction company fined after fatal trench collapse



    Date:
    1 Mar 2011

    Print friendly version

    A Buckinghamshire construction company has been fined after a man died when a trench collapsed on him.

    Builder Joshua Bladon, 22, from Leyton Buzzard, was killed while working on an extension at the house in Aylesbury on 16 April 2008.

    The HSE prosecuted Mr Bladon’s employer, Russell Smith Limited for breaching health and safety laws which led to the incident.

    Aylesbury Crown Court heard the firm had been contracted to carry out the extension work. Mr Bladon was digging a trench for the foundations with a colleague, who was using a mini-excavator. The main trench was being excavated at two different depths – 1.2 metres and two metres – in a deviation from the original plan, which was for a uniform 1.2 metres.

    At some point during the work, the other employee noticed Mr Bladon had disappeared and the long trench had collapsed in the middle. He tried to dig his colleague out with the help of neighbours but Mr Bladon was pronounced dead at the scene from asphyxiation.

    The HSE investigation found that Russell Smith Limited failed to take into account the risks of increasing the depth of the trench and so took no action to put the right safety measures in place. The company did not have a safe system of work on site which would have mitigated the hazards arising from the trench excavation.

    HSE's Inspector Gavin Bull, speaking after the hearing, said:

    "Trench collapses are a well-known cause of serious injury and death in the construction industry, this incident could easily have been avoided had the correct planning taken place.

    “This is a shocking case that has had a profound effect on the family of Mr Bladon. Companies need to recognise the dangers of excavations and ensure safe systems are in order prior to starting work."

    Russell Smith Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. The firm was fined at total of £5,000 and ordered to pay costs of £5,000.

    Related topics:

    Add a comment


    Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

    Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions


    This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.