Skip over navigation

Announcement fails to extinguish Equality Act speculation



    Date:
    6 Jul 2010

    Print friendly version

    An announcement issued by the Government Equalities Office over the weekend dampened speculation that the coalition Government might delay implementing Labour's flagship Equality Act 2010. 

    However, Audrey Williams, partner and head of discrimination law at law firm Eversheds, questions whether the announcment tells the full story.

     

    She said: "It is clear from the GEO statement that, like the Labour Government before it, the coalition does not intend to bring the entire Act into effect in one go. What is less apparent is which parts of the Act will be delayed beyond 1 October and for how long those provisions will remain in suspension.

     

    "Guidance published on the GEO's website does give us some clues. The concept of dual discrimination, the extension of public sector equality duties and rules prohibiting age discrimination by service providers are all seemingly on hold for now. 

     

    "There are no real surprises there: even under the Labour government there were no plans to bring these aspects of the Act into force as early as October this year. But whereas the previous government did have in mind a clear timetable for implementation over the next two years, the coalition refuses to be drawn on when, if ever, these parts of the Act will be implemented.

     

    "It is also interesting that today's guidance makes no mention of the Act's controversial provision that would allow employers to select from equally qualified job applicants by reference to their sex, race or some other protected characteristic to address under representation. 

     

    "The Conservatives voiced concerns about this clause during parliamentary debates and indicated, pre-election, that they would avoid implementing it should they come to power. Under Labour's timetable this new form of 'positive action' would be permitted from October this year but it would come as no surprise to learn that the coalition has decided that it should be held back."

    Related topics:

    Add a comment


    Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

    Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions


    This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.