Skip over navigation

Appeal tribunal widens scope for potential stress claims


    Date:
    30 Jan 2002

    Print friendly version

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has recently ruled that, in order to decide that someone has a "mental impairment" (and hence a "disability", according to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995), medical evidence must be adduced to show either:

    (a) that the Applicant was suffering from a clinically well-recognised mental illness; or

    (b) that the Applicant had some other form of mental impairment, which does not arise from a mental illness at all, but from some other cause.

    The distinction arises from a highly technical interpretation of the wording of the Act.  It is potentially very important, however, because mental impairments brought about by such things as "stress", "anxiety", etc. have so far been excluded as "disabilities" under the Act.

    Employers are advised to keep an ever-watchful eye on employee stress, either as part of an overall health and safety regime or under a specific Stress Management Policy, which provides for early warning indicators and the making of adjustments to minimise its impact upon their employees.

    Related topics:

    Add a comment


    Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

    Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions


    This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.