Skip over navigation

Appeal against mesothelioma compensation decision fails



    Date:
    23 Nov 2007

    Print friendly version

    The Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of a mesothelioma victim’s widow - dismissing an appeal from her husband’s former employer against the decision to award her compensation.

    The Court upheld a ruling from February 2007 awarding Angela Cox damages from her late husband Derek Cox’s former employer, International Combustion Limited  - now owned by Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Limited. Mr Cox had been exposed to high levels of asbestos whilst removing lagging from boilers for the company.

    The Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Limited appealed against the ruling on the basis that Mrs Cox was unable prove how long her husband had been exposed to the lethal fibres, but the Court dismissed this argument and found that Mr Cox had been exposed to asbestos dust and fibres for long enough to cause an increased risk of malignant mesothelioma.

    It ruled that International Combustion Limited should have been aware of the risk to its workers and should have done more to protect them.

    Representing Mrs Cox, lawyer Isobel Lovett hailed the decision as a great day for mesothelioma victims and their families, and for the British justice system:

    “This was a deliberate attempt from within the industry to reduce the cost of asbestos compensation. Negligent employers should be made to pay for the legacy of the asbestos disease they cause,”

    The ruling brings to an end a long legal battle for Mrs Cox, who first sued the company on behalf of her husband’s estate in 2005.

    Derek Cox died in 2002 from malignant mesothelioma.

     

    Related topics:

    Add a comment


    Send me an email-alert when someone comments in this discussion:

    Please remember that your name and comment will be visible to all users of the Network, and that we may edit or remove comments without notice. Terms and conditions


    This document is for general guidance and research purposes only, and does not purport to give professional advice. Please check the date at the top of the article; the Workplace Law Network retains historic articles for general research.